TWA Flight 800
Today is the tenth anniversary of the shoot-down. - M. R.
WHY THE OFFICIAL STORY CONTRADICTS ITSELF.
During the trial of James Sanders, the NTSB was caught red-handed rigging
the lab tests on the red residue found on the wreckage, then lying about the
results in their final report. - M. R.
>
Halliburton's Fleecing Ends -- Or Does It?
I wonder how many customers McDonald's Corp. would keep if instead of
including a Coke with a Happy Meal, as the menu promised, the company
charged for it twice.That's what Halliburton Co. did to Uncle Sam,
billing $45 for soda by the case and billing for it again when served by the
glass at meals.
July 15, 2006
One wreckage item in particular was described as possibly being the “smoking
gun” by FIRO Chairman Dr. Tom Stalcup. The wreckage exited Flight 800’s
airframe at apparent supersonic speeds and landed about a half mile closer
to JFK airport than any other piece of wreckage. The Navy recovered it, but
it never made it to the reconstruction hangar.
When TWA 800 exploded, radar tracked an object departing the scene of the
disaster at supersonic speeds, traveling at right angles to the path of the
747. The US Navy recovered the object, yet that object was never turned over
to the NTSB reconstruction hanger. Why? - M. R.
The mainstream media is cranking up a huge propaganda campaign to sell the
official version of history to you.
Please keep in mind that these are the same people who told you Iraq had
'nookular' bombs. - M. R.
WHY THE OFFICIAL STORY CONTRADICTS ITSELF.
As we near the anniversary of the shoot-down of TWA 800, look for the "Phlogs"
to pretend to expose the truth, but to point the finger of blame for the
missile at "terrorists".
But close examination shows why nobody at the scene reacted as if the
missile that shot down TWA 800 had come from an unknown source. - M. R.
July 08, 2006
MOre about TWA 800 and the evidence for a missile strike and government
cover-up are
HERE - M. R.
June 04, 2006
Graeme Sephton, an engineer and citizen investigator, submitted a Freedom of
Information Act request for the FBI lab reports. Mr. Sephton was denied. He
initiated a lawsuit. Surprisingly, he won and the court ordered the FBI to
produce the reports. Subsequently, the FBI came back and said it had
searched for the reports and couldn't find them. The court then ruled that
the FBI had made a good faith effort, and Mr. Sephton was denied. The most
widely publicized and most expensive accident investigation in the history
of aviation, and the FBI loses its own lab reports? That is highly unlikely.
Presumably, the objects still exist. Obviously, the FBI does not want the
public to know what it found.
More about TWA 800 is
HERE - M. R.
August 09, 2004
Jack Cashill tries to sell the lemon that Iranian terrorists shot down
TWA 800. And the reason that his story is just more war propaganda is
simple.
Witnesses who saw a missile hit
TWA 800 saw it rise up from an area where the US Navy was conducting
tests of Aegis-CEC, a co-operative multi-platform system designed to detect
and defend against missiles. The Navy tests included live-fire tests of
missiles to simulate the incoming threat. It should be noted that the system
had alreedy proven it worked in earlier tests near Hawaii.
As
TWA 800 fell out of the sky, some US Navy ships headed into the crash
scene, while other US Navy ships sailed back to port.
So, for Jack Cashill's "let's blame the Arabs for this too" theory to
work, the mythical terrorists had to sail int the middle of an ongoing USA
Navy test of an anti-missile system, flip off the very sort of missile the
system was designed to detect, kill a 747, then sail right back out WITHOUT
A SINGLE US NAVY WARSHIP OR PLANE GIVING CHASE.
You believe that? Cashill apparently does.
And here is another fact that Cashill seems to want to ignore. In the
court trial of James Sanders, the NTSB was caught rigging lab tests on the
red residue found inside the
TWA 800 cabin, and lying about the test results when the rigging did not
produce the desired results. Why would the NTSB be covering up for Iranians?
Or is Jack Cashill's real purpose to protect the Navy by framing the
enemy de jour for the shoot-down of
TWA 800? - M. R.
July 11,
2006
July 12,
2006
How the FBI misled the public