Personal Income Tax - doesn't go to US Government. It pays interest to international bankers, is illegal, voluntary tax, not ratified by 16th amendment. Supreme Court shows - no law requires you to file, pay or submit to IRS.

You can learn ways to write to IRS and have your individual master file corrected so you never have to file or pay personal income tax - see Pastor Wm. Standring, Covington KY

    Property tax             pays for schools, education.
    Gas tax                    pays for highways.
Personal Income Tax     pays foreign bankers interest on borrowed Fed. Reserve notes.
Pres. Reagan said no personal income tax reaches US government [it goes to international bankers].

US Constitution allow us to print our own, interest free money, instead of borrowing, at high interest, from international bankers thru the Federal Reserve, with is a private corporation, not of our government and having no reserves.

Who Owns You?                        Freedom to Fascism- Russo's movie - No Tax- American Government is Corrupt

Voluntary Tax: Why Today's Income Taxes as Applied are Illegal!

1040 Checkmate? October 18, 2006

In sum, the PRA requires that all government agencies display valid OMB control numbers and certain disclosures directly on all information collection forms that the public is requested to file. Lawrence's sole defense was he was not required to file an IRS Form 1040 because it displays an invalid OMB control number.

Government officials knew that if the case went to trial, it would expose the fraudulent, counterfeit 1040. They also must have known that a trial would expose the ongoing conspiracy between OMB and IRS to publish 1040 forms each year that those agencies knew were in violation of the PRA. That would raise the issue that the Form 1040, with its invalid control number, is being used by the Government to cover up the underlying constitutional tort -- that is, the enforcement of a direct, unapportioned tax on the labor of every working man, women and child in America.

Congressman Ron Paul Addresses IRS and 501-C3 Crack Down            A Brief Tax History of America

HOW THE IRS LIES TO EMPLOYERS ABOUT WITHHOLDING

Robert Schulz, Chairman of the Board of We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., made a swing through 37 cities in April and May of 2003. Before he arrived at each destination, he sent, via certified mail, an invitation to both the IRS and U.S. Attorney's offices to come to his public seminars and correct him if he was giving out the wrong legal facts regarding withholding. What could be more reasonable? In not one of those 37 cities did either DOJ or IRS send any representative, begging the question, "Why not?"

September 19, 2005

FEDS DESPERATE TO SHUT UP BILL BENSON

Bill Benson, for those who don't know, is the individual who holds the 17,000 court certified documents that prove beyond any doubt that the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was never ratified. The IRS uses the Sixteenth Amendment, supported by cowardly federal judges, to defraud the American people of the fruit of their labors via the income tax. Those of us who have studied this issue know their position of relying on the fraudulently ratified Sixteenth Amendment is a lie, but most Americans don't understand their trickery.    June 24, 2005

FLASHBACK: IRS Loses Tax Case Against FedEx Pilot

During her testimony Kuglin testified that since 1995, she had sent numerous letters to the IRS requesting that they inform her of what law required her to pay the Individual Income Tax. To this day, she has not received an answer. Before Joe Banister, there was Vernice Kuglin. - M. R.    June 09, 2005

IRS Loses A Big One
The IRS took a women to court for not paying taxes. The woman claimed that the IRS could not prove there was a law requiring her to pay taxes on compensation. The woman won the case! - M. R

Whistle Blower Charged Criminally By IRS; Claims Charges 'Bogus'

Let's set aside questions about the legality of taxes or the ratification of the 16th Amendment, and get down to a simple and basic issue.

Is a government that provably lies to the people to initiate an illegal war of conquest entitled to collect taxes from the people it lied to, to pay for that illegal war?

Our entire nation is based on the premise of rule with the consent of the governed.

Well, I do not consent to be lied to. I do not consent to wars of conquest based on lies. I cannot in good conscience consent to lies and wars based on lies without losing everything that being an American is supposed to stand for. Therefore this government does not rule with my consent. - M. R.    November 06, 2003

How the IRS Violates It's Own Code         August 24, 2003

The Law That Never Was     http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/    Bill Benson

The 16th Amendment, on which the personal income tax is based, may not have been properly ratified after all! In his letter of transmittal to Congress, Secretary of State Philander Knox never even used the word "ratified", he merely declared the amendment to be "in effect". - M. R.

The Premise: The authority of the federal government to collect its income tax depends upon the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the federal income tax amendment, which was allegedly ratified in 1913. After a year of extensive research, Bill Benson discovered that the 16th Amendment was not ratified by the required 3/4 of the states, but nevertheless Secretary of State Philander Knox fraudulently announced ratification.
Text of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America:
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

IRS Revenue Agent Reveals IRS is a Fraud

You need to understand that with an Internal Revenue Code, Code of Federal Regulations, and other "official documents" spouting off several different definitions of United States, Internal Revenue Service and other important terms, this deception that keeps people ignorant is not a coincidence. The writers of the Code used semantics and legalese to make us think that we are required to pay the income tax and file an income tax return. Former IRS commissioner Shirley Peterson even stated that, and I quote, "Eight decades of amendments….to (the) code have produced a virtually impenetrable maze….The rules are unintelligible to most citizens….The rules are equally mysterious to many government employees who are charged with administering and enforcing the law."      August 23, 2003

Debunking IRS Lies

31 Questions and Answers about the IRS, Revision 3.2

WE DON'T NEED INCOME TAX... THE FEDERAL RESERVE FRAUD    August 18, 2003

YOU ARE A SLAVE!     August 15, 2003

FEDERAL INCOME TAX... PROOF OF CONSPIRACY

What does the law say? There are two kinds of federal taxes, only two: direct and indirect. There is no third kind of federal tax. The law - the Constitution - says that all federal taxes must be one or the other. In Brushaber v. Union Pacific (240 US 1), in 1915, the US Supreme Court ruled that the income tax is legal (constitutional), but that it is an indirect tax. Indeed, in Stanton v. Baltic Mining (240 US 103), just a year later, the same judges said the same thing and added that their previous ruling, in Brushaber, created "no new power of taxation." In other words, Brushaber limited the federal government’s power to tax rather than expand it; limited it by forcefully explaining where that power could not reach. Nothing had changed since the Court ruled the income tax unconstitutional in 1894, in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (158 US 601). The trouble with the tax today is that our friends at IRS are administering it illegally as a direct tax, which the Supreme Court forbade. That is the secret they don’t want you to know.

http://www.givemeliberty.org/           The Lawsuit To Restore Constitutional Order                We The People vs. The U.S. Government

more IRS Articles & Discussion from home page of this web site.