Taitz Replies to Motion to Dismiss, in Barnett vs. Obama

ARGUMENTS HISTORIC IN DEFENSE OF RIGHTS OF “WE THE PEOPLE”

by John Charlton

(Sept. 21, 2009) — Late this afternoon, Dr. Orly Taitz, lead counsel in Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al. filed her response to the Defense’s Motion to Dismiss, which will be heard by Judge David O. Carter, in court, on October 5th. ...

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/09/21/taitz-replies-to-motion-to-dismiss-in-barnett-vs-obama/

Dr. Charles Lincoln masterfully explains why the court should not dismiss the Barnett v Obama lawsuit.  In this action, Captain Barnett decided last January that she did not want to accept orders from Obama till he proved he had natural born citizen status and could rightfully ascend to the Office of President of the United States.

Obama naturally wants the case dismissed so that he can carry on with his budget-busting agenda to change America.

But I believe you will love the work of Dr. Lincoln because it so beautifully explains that the court stands as the last bastion of defense against a corrupt and illegally constituted Presidency.  If the court does not act as it should to give remedy by allowing the evidence to bask in the light of public and judicial scrutiny, then violent rebellion might result, as it rightly should.

The pleading cites Daniel Webster's arguments in Luther v Borden that the people are the supreme sovereigns and that they have the right to disband and reconstitute the government, casting it from a different model, if they so choose, without fear of violence by the existing government.  We the People ought continually to remind our governors of this fact as we throw them out of office for their malfeasance and arrogant abuse of due process. 

I make this point because the Constitution of Florida used to contain a provision to the above effect, but that provision does not exist in the current Constitution.  Apparently, our governors want us to forget all about our power to redo government at our whim if it does not adequately protect our rights.

Please take the time to read the attached pleading and carefully consider each of the points it makes.  In spite of its mild manner, it does indeed rattle a saber at our increasingly crooked courts, reminding the judiciary of its mortality.

Bob Hurt - http://bobhurt.com