> 10

Writ of Quo Warranto

In the Matter of james-thomas:mcbride

Issued to:
United States District Court Judge Ivan Davis
U.S. District Court Judge Ivan Davis
Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse
401 Courthouse Square
Alexandria, VA 22314
16 June 2014
Via U.S. Postal Service REGISTERED MAIL
RA 393 427 525 US

The purpose of this writ is to review for the Roman Curia the authority claimed by this Court justifying its action taken against the living man james-thomas:mcbride.

Please provide photocopies of the American Bar Association Cards issued to all members of the Court associated with this case and also the Foreign Agent Documents required to be on file. Please include the Bar Association license numbers as a list.

Please describe for us what is meant by "United States District Court" as opposed to "U.S. District Court"? Are we to understand that "U.S." is simply an abbreviation for "United States" or does it denote a separate court and jurisdiction? If these are separate entities, in what jurisdiction does the "United States District Court" operate? In what jurisdiction does the "U.S. District Court" operate? In which of these Courts is james-thomas:mcbride being addressed?

195

Who holds administrative responsibility for the "United States District Court" that you operate? If it is a separate entity, who holds administrative responsibility for the "U.S. District Court"?

Our records show that james-thomas:mcbride was born an Ohio State Citizen on the land of the geographically defined Ohio State sixty years ago. Does this Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise?

Our records similarly show that james-thomas brought claim for his life before the Holy See after unscrupulous men deprived him of his natural estate while still a baby in his cradle. These individuals falsely claimed that they "represented" him, claimed that their commercial corporation was his beneficiary, misappropriated his credit, seized his estate, and enslaved him as chattel belonging to his own estate without his knowledge or consent. Thereafter, they claimed that he was an employee of their corporation, a "volunteer" performing various jobs including work as a postal union employee, a merchant mariner, a withholding agent for the collection of taxes, and other duties as assigned, without payment or other consideration for his work. Does this Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise?

It is our understanding that there are two entities calling themselves "the" united states of America and they are: The United States of America (major) comprised of now-50 geographically defined states created by Commonwealth Trust or Statehood Compacts and joined together by The Articles of Confederation (1781) and the United States of America (minor) a "union" of "American states" comprised of 7 Insular states owned as "federal territories and possessions" including the State of New Columbia/ Guam/ Puerto Rico/American Samoa/ American Virgin Islands and et alia. Does this Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise?

According to our records as part of the fraud perpetuated

196

against james-thomas:mcbride and his estate - his estate was re-venued twice - once by a corporate franchise of "the United States of America, Incorporated" doing business under conditions of semantic deceit and again by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) doing business as the "UNITED STATES" (INC.) which removed his estate to Puerto Rico and the foreign jurisdiction of the United States of America (minor) described above. Does this Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise?

Is this second fraudulent re-venue of james-thomas:mcbride's estate to Puerto Rico the basis of the Court's presumption that he is a "U.S. citizen"? Is this Court claiming jurisdiction over the living man or the similarly named Puerto Rican ESTATE trust?

If claiming jurisdiction over the living man james-thomas:mcbride-by what right or reasoning does this Court claim that fraud is a basis for presumption and action against the victim of a crime?

If claiming jurisdiction over a fraudulently created Roman Inferior ESTATE trust that has been moved to a foreign jurisdiction in obvious Breach of Trust-by what rationale does this Court support Breach of Trust or deny the redemption of the JAMES THOMAS MCBRIDE ESTATE by the lawful beneficiary?

Formed as a Roman Inferior Trust the james-thomas:mcbride ESTATE is subject to the Roman Civil Law. As the fraud was discovered and prosecuted under Roman Civil Law and entered upon the Vatican Chancery Court there can be no mistake and no excuse or evasion related to the distribution of assets owed. Does this Court dispute the supreme authority of the Roman Curia over all legal fictions created under Roman Civil Law?

It is our understanding that the FEDERAL RESERVE has since contrived to re-venue these ESTATES rightfully belonging

197

to American State Citizens yet again, and to claim that they are now being operated as transmitting utilities under UNITED NATIONS auspices. If so, the entire chain of fraud continues to result in more fraud. Fraud once begun taints everything it touches, invalidating claims made at every step forever afterward, no matter how venerable a fraud maybe. That is why there is no statute of limitation on any act of fraud. Does this Court pretend otherwise?

Our records show that james-thomas re-venued his redeemed estate to the jurisdiction of the air under the direct protection of the Office of the Pope and that he has maintained his material interests on the land of The United States of America (major) and the Ohio State as a beneficiary of his birthright estate and that he has faithfully kept the peace and expressed the goodwill required of him as an inhabitant of the Divine Province, which has been established as a seat of government by the Universal Postal Union. Does this Court have any information or documentation proving otherwise? Does this Court dispute the authority of the Universal Postal Union or its establishment of a post office serving the inhabitants of the air jurisdiction represented by the Divine Province? If so, why does this Court believe that the air jurisdiction is any different from the jurisdictions of the land or the sea? Why should those individuals who are permanently domiciled in the jurisdiction of the air not be entitled to the same services?

It is our understanding that james-thomas:mcbride is lawfully a birthright Citizen of the Ohio State having civil authority as Caesar on the land and that he is not now and has never voluntarily consented under conditions of full disclosure and equity to any "US citizenship" or "U.S. citizenship" status conferred by the United States of America (minor) nor any corporate "citizenship" whatsoever conferred by any commercial or non-profit corporation. Does this Court have any information or documentation substantively proving otherwise?

198

According to sworn affidavits of unrebutted fact proven in law by due process and standing on the record of several international courts it has been the practice of agents of the UNITED STATES (INC.) and of the United States of America (minor) to claim that American State Citizens (like:mcbride) have by various mistaken acts such as filing tax forms -when coerced to do so by persons representing "the U.S. government"­ accepted [unpaid] employment or otherwise accepted undisclosed private contracts and thereby obligated themselves to perform according to corporate policies, regulations, codes, and other statutory rules which apply only to employees of the United States of America (minor) / the UNITED STAPES (INC. ) / the United States of America, Inc. or other similar deceitfully named incorporated entities operating in international maritime jurisdictions. Does this Court have any proof of james-thomas:mcbride's knowing and voluntary employment as a postal union employee of the United States of America (minor)? As a withholding agent responsible for collecting excise taxes owed to the United States of America (minor)? As a member of the Merchant Marine Service of the United States of America (minor)? Does this Court have any proof of claim of valid maritime employment contract serving to justify presumption of "U.S. citizenship"? Does this Court have job descriptions, time sheets, supervisory records, or other documentation lending credibility to these presumptions of employment? Does this Court have proof that such employment was undertaken knowingly, willingly, and under conditions of complete disclosure? Does this Court have proof that such employment was not coerced and not imposed under conditions of peonage or slavery?

Does this Court have any substantive reason to believe that james-thomas:mcbride knowingly and willingly agreed to give up his status as a State Citizen in favor of the slave status of a "US citizen" and thereby agreed - among other things -to be subject to the members of the US Congress reigning as kings and queens

199

over him? That he knowingly and willingly agreed to be subject to "Selective Service" requirements? That he willingly and knowingly agreed to "donate" all his credit - savings, checking, and escrow accounts - to a Puerto Rican ESTATE trust? That he agreed to give away his labor in support of a foreign maritime entity merely and deceptively calling itself "the United States of America"? That he similarly agreed to let a foreign maritime government hypothecate debt against his private property? That he "voluntarily" contracted to accept "debt notes" - I.O.U. 's - created out of paper and hot air - "in equitable exchange" for hi s real property? Is the "United States District Court' 'in any plausible position while presuming any of these conditions to be true, or any of the implied contracts to be equitable?

What was james-thomas:mcbride supposedly receiving in exchange for "willingly" subjecting himself to the status of a "U.S. citizen" and giving away all his private property, even his guaranteed "Natural and Unalienable Rights" to the deceptively named United States of America (minor)? Does the Court claim that he received the "benefit" of access to the "Public Charitable Trust" - an unfunded private trust set up to provide relief to "freed" slaves in the wake of the Civil War? Does the Court claim that mcbride received charitable "benefits" from the "Social Security" program - which was presented to him and millions of other American State Citizens as a "required government insurance program" they were obligated to pay for as a condition of having employment in both public and private sectors? Does the Court know that these Social Security insurance payments were trustingly placed into a separate "guaranteed" fund that was subsequently pillaged and robbed by members of the "US Congress" operating as an oligarchy under conditions of semantic deceit and fraud as the separate and foreign government of "the United States of America (minor)"?

It is our understanding that State Citizen of Ohio james-thomas:mcbride is not subject to his employees and that he is

200

owed not only good faith service but "amity in perpetuity" "friendship" "aid and assistance" from the British Crown and all members of the American Bar Association who were formerly and wrongly licensed to act as privateers against the estate interests of james-thomas:mcbride. Is this Court aware that as of September 1, 2013 all court officers became 100 % individually liable for their acts and omissions against American State Citizens including james-thomas:mcbride?

It appears likely that the Court endeavors to presume that james-thomas's estate is subject to the Court and that his estate is the actual object of its actions rather than the living man. Having been informed that the re-venue of his birth estate by the "State of Ohio" and its agencies was fraudulent, and therefore the subsequent re-venue of his birth estate by the International Monetary Fund and its agents to Puerto Rico was similarly tainted by fraud, and now having been informed that james-thomas's estate has been re-venued to the jurisdiction of the air under the protection of FRANCISCUS and that he maintains his material interests and estate upon the land of Ohio as a beneficiary - what possible rationale does this Court have for assuming jurisdiction over james-thomas:mcbride or his estate? He is a living man, a State Citizen of Ohio, a foreign state, and an American National inhabiting The United States of America (major), a foreign nation, and his individual estate domicile has been re-venued to the jurisdiction of the air. He is as immune from prosecution by the United States of America (minor) as a Finnish National, so we must ask what justification does this Court have for addressing him, much less arresting him?

The same acts of fraud and re-venue perpetuated against j ames-thomas:mcbride and other American State Citizens were similarly employed against the interests of the organic American states and The United States of America (major) by criminally inclined governmental services corporations merely under contract to provide public services to the victims and by the United States

201

of America (minor) which pretended to "represent" The United States of America (major) while usurping upon the land, plundering its assets, and enslaving its people. All acts of fraud whether perpetuated by individuals or nations are similarly subject to discovery and they all have the same result: fraud vitiates all claims made upon it. Thus all interest in the geographically defined American states and all interest in the American people including their estates and their vessels in commerce reverts directly to the organic states and their living inhabitants without exception. Having been fully informed regarding the current status of these matters does the "United States District Court" maintain any charge against james-thomas:mcbride?

James-thomas:mcbride has been charged by this Court with making false claims of diplomatic immunity. We think rather that it is this Court and the officials running the United States of America (minor) who should be concerned about maintaining diplomatic immunity. James-thomas:mcbride is an individual "organic state" of the Union and as such exercises all civil authority upon the land of The United States of America (major). He is immune from prosecution by any foreign nation, including the United States of America (minor). Diplomatic immunity is a privileged status granted by the Global Estate Trust to heads of state, ambassadors, and others entrusted with affairs of state -including postmasters. James-thomas was appointed to act as a regional Postmaster in charge of North America, because the US POSTMASTER is in default and self-interestedly failing to provide the services American State Citizens are guaranteed by the Universal Postal Union. The UPU which is and always was an agency of the Global Estate Trust under the direct guidance of the Pope acting as Trustee is obligated to provide those services to American State Citizens. The US POSTMASTER has for some time failed to properly present passport applications for the use of American State Citizens and committed constructive fraud by not allowing them to present their status as anything but "U.S. citizen"

202

- that is, a "citizen" of the United States of America (minor). This is a form of self-incriminating identity theft enforced via monopoly inducement and inducement to perjury. It cannot be allowed or condoned by the Universal Postal Union. His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI appointed james-thomas:mcbride to act as Postmaster General of North America to correct this and other forms of misadministration of postal services currently affecting Canada and The United States of America (major). James-thomas:mcbride is most definitely owed diplomatic immunity in all dealings he undertakes with the United States of America (minor) and so are the other members of the Divine Province who act as postmasters of The United States of America (major). Having been fully informed of the State Citizen status of james-thomas:mcbride and the nature, purpose, and source of his office, does this Court continue to pretend jurisdiction over him or allege any wrong-doing related to his claim of international diplomatic immunity for himself and those he appoints to act as postmasters serving The United States of America (major)? Does this Court have any honest questions about his mandate to provide lawful identification and valid passports for American State Citizens or is this arrest simply more criminal obstruction aimed at enforcing identity theft and felony fraud?

James-thomas:mcbride has also been charged by this Court with issuing false documents to other members of the Divine Province. All members of the Divine Province organization are American State Citizens who have properly re-venued their estates from Puerto Rico to the global jurisdiction of the air and who maintain their material interests on the land as beneficiaries and inheritors thereof. They operate under the direct protection of FRANCISCUS and the Global Estate Trust and the Universal Postal Union as postmasters of The United States of America (major). We fail to see how this Court, a corporate administrative tribunal operated under contract by agencies of the United States

203

of America (minor) can accuse james-thomas:mcbride of any wrong-doing when he is clearly occupying a foreign and superior office and responsibly administering his duties without prejudice or harm to anyone. It is his job to provide proper identification and passports to American State Citizens, and it is especially his responsibility to appoint postmasters to serve The United States of America (major) and expedite the delivery of services to American State Citizens guaranteed by the UPU. Members of the Divine Province organization operate as international peacekeepers and have individually promised to keep the peace. Does this Court have any cause to complain?

We require a prompt reply from the "U.S. District Court" and/or the "United States District Court" - whichever or both of which are prosecuting j ames-thomas:mcbride.

Anna Maria Riezinger, private attorney in service to His Holiness, Francis/ Civil Judge Advocate for The United States of America (major), non-negotiable signature, all rights reserved this        day of June in the year 2014.

204