We Must Quit "Paying" by Mary Croft

This is as succinct as I could get it.

This is not complicated.   If it isn't simple, it isn't accurate.

NO ONE has ever been able to prove that I owe a corporation, a government agency, a utility company, a bank, or a court (all legal fictions). They ALL are paid with my credit from my account at the Public Trust, as soon as I provide "Government-issued Identification". That "ID" does NOT identify me. It identifies my credit account. The 'NAME & SIN/SSN' is all that Public Service Providers (Servants) require in order to get paid. They all operate on my credit ... not my cash. All public services are Pre-paid. How do they justify demanding my cash afterward?  That is double-dipping and, according to CRA, undeclared income.

The crux of it is: WE never contracted with any of them; all we did was sign FOR (on behalf of) our account, so it is our account which has a contract with a legal fiction. Servants mail us charges, solely to get our cash, yet nowhere, on any paper we receive, is there any proof that it is we who owe. We do not owe. ALL charges are meant for Public Trustees. We cannot possibly be Trustees who settle accounts, as we have no direct access to that account.

We were never meant to pay for anything. We have unlimited credit, backed by our Security –the Statement of Birth signed by our mums AND every paper we ever signed. They're all securities –the currency that Public Servants use. They do not require our cash. We must stop giving our cash to legal fictions which do NOT exist, except on paper. WE did not and cannot contract with them. They contract with only other legal fictions, e.g. our credit accounts.

Ergo, Public Servants have jurisdiction over only that account. NONE of them has jurisdiction over us. If Servants claim to have authority over living people, they'll be required to prove it. When Servants ask for our name, what they actually want is the name of our credit account.

When we complete an application for a service, or any paper that the Servants claim we must "sign", we are authorizing them access to our credit. We are NOT authorizing them access to our cash.  So, as proxy for the account, I sign thus:

By:  Mary

FOR: (Account # & NAME)

Any charge that we receive is evidence of their charge to our account. That paper is an Offer to Contract, for us to discharge their charge, yet they intend that we pay cash. Since all contracts must include Equal Consideration, what's in it for us?  They use credit; we use cash. If their Offer does not include a cheque, for the same amount, the Offer is invalid, so their paper is meaningless. "Thank you for your offer but I did not find your cheque enclosed." ~ Ron Lutz

If we're not part of the solution, we're part of the problem.

Mary           LoveLaughLearn22@gmail.com

Ted comments; Some say, if it's not simple, it's not true,

However many things are far more complicated than people think.  They error to think they understand something when they've not considered many (suppressed facts.)